Ron Paul is not a racist!

Recap:

OP still stands as undisputed. Its a NAACP President, endorsing Ron Paul in 2008.

NAACP=
National
Association for the
Advancement of
Colored
People

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyEE0qpfeig"]Can't Touch This - Mc Hammer - YouTube[/ame]

 

wrong again

“UPDATE: Nelson Linder contacted our office and wanted prisonplanet.com to stress the fact that he made his comments as a private citizen, not as president of the Austin NAACP. He said the libertarian platform deserves the same scrutiny as the Democratic and Republican parties receive in this nation. He went on to say that some on the web have construed that he is endorsing Ron Paul. And that is not the case. Mr. Linder went on to say that the interview was designed to discuss local issues concerning civil rights and civil liberties and his knowledge of the Libertarian party and Ron Paul.”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011308_not_racist.htm



just admit you're wrong and drop the charade

H.R.3706

Latest Title: A bill to amend title 5, United States Code, to make the birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., a legal public holiday.

Sponsor: Rep Hall, Katie [IN-1] (introduced 7/29/1983) Cosponsors [108]

Related Bills: H.R.3345 - Latest Major Action: 11/2/1983 Became Public Law No: 98-144.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d098:H.R.3706:

 

The NAACP didn't endorse Paul in 2008. But guess who did? That's right, Stormfront. And they're endorsing him again in 2012.

 

Read the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing OP, you retarded ape.

 

I've read it. From an intellectual standpoint it's an embarassment. And your insults, though typical of the average Ron Paul supporter, are equally impotent. To simplify it for you, what you've said is stupid.

 

it's amazing how rothbard's 'outreach to rednecks' has pulled the wool over these kid's eyes

it was modeled on senator joe mccarthy's witch hunts and david duke's campaigns

slate.com

 

You're trying way too hard. You must be scared that he will win.
Stop taking (*)(*)(*)(*) so literal. Its nauseating that you would denounce the comments of a NAACP leader just because he was "doing this as a private citizen." Give me a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing break. A complete moron can see that you are just making (*)(*)(*)(*) up because you are scared.

If you are so confident he is "unelectable" then give up. Stop debating me.

 

I know. The ignorance among these lemmings for Paul is chilling.

 

Talking Point.

TV...

 

Wayyyy back there on my post # 78

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h1979-578
TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS H.R. 5461, DESIGNATING THE BIRTHDAY OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. A LEGAL PUBLIC HOLIDAY. (MOTION PASSED:2/3 REQUIRED)


He 'did' vote for it after an amendment to change the date.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h1979-624
TO AMEND H.R. 5461, MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY, BY DESIGNATING THE THIRD MONDAY IN JANUARY RATHER THAN JANUARY 15 AS THE LEGAL HOLIDAY.

Because.......he didn't feel it was appropriate to observe a mans birthday as a national holiday.

 

Jesus H. Christ, can't you read? Nowhere does it say that the Dallas NAACP as an organization has endorsed Paul. One man who just happens to lead that organization has endorsed Paul and he's made it clear that he's acting as a private citizen.

Now Stormfront, that's a whole different story. Stormfront is acting as an organization inits endorsement of Paul.

 

Stark and cold reality. If Paul told you to send him all of your money you'd try squirting dimes out of your ass to send to him.

 

Its AUSTIN TEXAS you (*)(*)(*)(*)ing moronic waste of human skin.

Dont they teach you how to read in your welfare funded public school?

 

you're projecting, this has been easy and fun for me

what a joke, ron paul will never be the president of the united states

the more you post the more you show how confused you are

show us an naacp source that says they endorse ron paul for president

 

Dujac, who are you endorsing or hoping will win? Why aren't you out there {or here for that matter} campaigning or tooting your own horn for your chosen electorate?

 

I stand corrected. That doesn't change the fact that the NAACP hasn't endorsed Paul. And you really ought to rein in your intellectually impotent and childish insults. It doesn't lend any credibility to your already retarded debate style.

 

i'm undecided with plenty of time to choose

 

How can you chastize me for being insulting, and then insult me?

You are discrediting what the man is saying, just because he acted as a private citizen? Tell me how that makes sense?

 

Found this a bit interesting..I also find it highly interesting that it happened in 2008....never to be heard about again until now....

Funny that's all they can dig up to attack him with...

http://www.nolanchart.com/article1134-naacp-president-ron-paul-is-not-a-racist.html

 

even as a private citizen, nelson linder did not endorse ron paul

“UPDATE: Nelson Linder contacted our office and wanted prisonplanet.com to stress the fact that he made his comments as a private citizen, not as president of the Austin NAACP. He said the libertarian platform deserves the same scrutiny as the Democratic and Republican parties receive in this nation. He went on to say that some on the web have construed that he is endorsing Ron Paul. And that is not the case. Mr. Linder went on to say that the interview was designed to discuss local issues concerning civil rights and civil liberties and his knowledge of the Libertarian party and Ron Paul.”


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/011308_not_racist.htm


i've asked for an naacp source that says they're endorsing ron paul, but you know there isn't one, because they certainly don't endorse him

 

I critiqued your debate style, not you personally which is a far cry from your personal insults towards me. You're fortunate that I don't report them but then I attribute them to the usual imbecilic behavior of Paul's lemmings.

What I've discredited is your assertion that one man who happens to be the President of the Austin NAACP speaks for the entire organization when he has clearly stated that he only speaks for himself.

 

My debate style is evidence backed fact stating.
Yours, desperation backed nit picking.
Lemmings? Really? Thats a first...

How does that affect the message?
Seriously. A doctor can endorse a drug as himself, not his practice. Hes still a doctor.

I get it. Its so damaging to your scheme, you have to discredit it no matter what.

 

then show us an naacp source that says they're endorsing ron paul

 

Why should I? Did you read the OP?

 

yes i read it and and i've discredited your assertion that he endorsed ron paul