The Court has held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-10078_aplc.pdf The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html Please: Present to us an argument, within the bounds of current jurisprudence, that 'arms" as the term is used in the 2nd, includes nuclear weapons. I accept your concession in advance.
If someone believes a particular course of action is just, they should be willing to engage in the dirty work that is necessary.
still telling us that military experience in a free fire zone is the same as an armed civilian environment where you are responsible for each round you fire. How many people in nam were charged when rounds they cranked off hit a innocent villager?
