Special counsel investigating Biden’s handling of classified material not expected to bring charges

Not sure what alternate reality that comes from...but it is certainly creative. (and unfounded in the real world)

 

It seems like the righties are pretty desperate to distract everyone from the fact that things aren’t going well in this thread, Or in reality.

 

And, again, how do you know that the documents turned in by Biden were at a level of classification that required a SCIF?

 

He absolutely was, and wasnt requires to Cooperate with such a corrupt attempt to jail him.

 

Blah Blah Blah

Nothing in that post refutes, in any way, the FACTS that I presented

Trump had the documents
Trump was not authorized to have the documents
Trump refused to return the documents.

Those three FACTS add up to a violation of 18 USC 793(e) which Trump has been indicted 32 times for violating.

 

with due respect, there is no need to keep repeating yourself. We get it.. You despise "lefties". This attitude contributes to the divisions in this country.
If you disagree , just indicate that you do and why.

 

The fact your post addressed only me there is interesting and indicative of a strong bias. I was one of two participating.

As for the strong divisions in our country, that I'd unfortunately on the left. They have largely chosen hate over country. From support of terrorist organizations like blm to the irrational hatred of Trump, and the utilization of the feds to fascists attack those they dislike.

 

The law says you are wrong. About both things. Sorry.

 

The law, as applied to the facts, makes it even worse.

 

False, your interpretation of the law is what you meant.

Your interpretation of the law, as applied to the opinions.

 

My interpretation of the law is that the law matters. Even for former presidents. Why do you disagree?

 

Well he was legally required to comply with a subpoena, just like anyone else would be. Granted you think he’s above the law, but the law disagrees.

 

Your interpretation of the law is whatever fits your agenda at that time.

 

Incorrect, no one is required to obey the unlawful.

 

A lawful subpoena is not unlawful. You sound like those sovereign citizens who think they can pick which laws apply lol

 

Not every subpoena is lawful, this one wasn't.

I'm no sovereign citizen, but I know corruption when I see it.

 

It wasn’t because you declared it lol

 

It was because those behind the subpeonas have declared their intent "to get Trump" a long time ago.

The witch hunt has been ongoing for years. I

 

Who behind the subpoena said that?

 

I will not do your research for you, that is your responsibility.

 

I did, you made it up.

 

No, you didnt. And no i didnt.

 

That's a nice conversation you are having with the mirror there, but there's no "interpretation" to be had here. He had no legal right to custody of the documents. He took custody anyway. He obstructed attempts to return the documents to their rightful custodians. This is not arguable, bud.

 

No, dude, the law is absolutely clear on this. And if Trump actually thought he had a legal claim to these documents (no one is dumb enough to think he did), then he would have taken legal actual to retain them . . . he didn't. Instead, he tried to hide them. Welcome to reality!

 

That sounds just a tad paranoid. Just how far would you go to defend Trump?? Do you really think he gives a damn about you?? Three things matter to trump. : Money, POWER and HIMSELF ( his self interests , and how HE benefits.) His supporters just feed his ego.( so they are useful , in that way)