He never advocated violence. He was not at the Capitol. If we are going down this told then Incandescent give you a long list of Dems who caused all the BLM and Antifa violence which was FAR more than the 4 hour riot at the Capitol. Had there been the proper security EVEN TRUMP was calling for there wouldn't have been the breech of the police lines and into the Capitol.
Yes where are the Dems who were responsible for security that day, why haven't we heard from them. And no I don't know that EVERY person who has testifies is a Republican. What court case is tying this all together? What case has proved some direct connection with Trump?
Why is an official government committee so politically biased and partisan only giving the one side and openly violating the rights of private citizens? Why is a Congressional committee engaged in an unconstitutional criminal investigation for the purpose of having private citizens indicted and prosecuted?
Oh we know, I heard he said, I thought it meant, I thought it was dumb, blah blah blah we get it. Now give access to the entire interviews and allow anyone and I mean anyone to challenge their answer or offer an opposing view. Let's not play games here, when Hunter's inquiry comes around next year, if the Republicans only put Manchin and Sinema as the left's representation, you will be screaming illegitimate committee, and you will be correct.
But for his lies about a “stolen election” there would have been no riot, not even a rally in DC on Jan 6. He was the proximate cause of everything that happened that day.
Then we can start charging all the other politicans without whose rhetoric there would be no protest. In the meantime he never advocated violence always told people to be peaceful in mkaingbtheie VOICES be heard. So what exactly do you think should happen?
