This Total Disaster Called The DNC Convention

Really that is your proof?????

Besides not understanding what is meant by the term proof even what you have given is ridiculous.

Emails deriding Bernie Sanders just means that some people in the DNC don't like Bernie. Is it illegal now to dislike someone? How many derogatory emails are floating around the RNC about Trump and Cruz?

The emails show no such racism, no sexism and no homophobia. You are just making that up. Someones blog post with the most ridiculous interpretations of innocuous statements is not proof.

Bob Dornan...really...wikipaedia...really? Those 4700 supposed suspect affidavits were not suspect at all. They were people registered in Garden Grove with Hispanic names. Those affidavits were singled out by the racist Dornan to be be investigated and House Republicans wanted to compare their signatures with known incorrect INS records. The whole investigation was found to be unconstitutional and racist.

Like I said you have ZERO proof.

Oh and by the way duplicate voter registrations mean absolutely nothing. We are a mobile population. I am betting I am still registered in Virginia, Illinois and Connecticut as well as CA. Why because until recently (within the past year) when you move and reregister to vote you were not asked if you previously registered in another state. You were only asked if you registered in a different district in the same state. Why...because states control their own elections individually without regard to what other states are doing. So would you support a national ID? That is what many on the left have pushed for and would resolve this whole issue but the tin foil hat wearing conservatives didn't want it.

 

the OP here denies reality that BOTH parties are corrupt and there is no difference in the two wo why people reply to this thread is beyond me.lo

 

Because Trump isn't the GOP of post-1989/pre-2016.

The Bush era RINO GOP is dead.

The Democrats are still Democrats, though, and their candidate is unprecedentedly corrupt and owned by Wall Street and AIPAC.


.

 

Absolutely, there's no other explanation.

Dems are a corrupt, bloated establishment that is collapsing from within.

 

I've been enjoying the show for sure. Will come down to the wire between Trump and Hillary.

 

You asked for proof, I gave proof. Your only rebuttal is that you don't believe in your opinion that it is proof.

Well that is not a valid rebuttal.

You have to disprove what I have provided as proof, and from what I saw, you didn't provide a single bit of evidence to rebut the evidence that I presented.

 

Here's more, although you just poo poo the first 4 links:

The crusade of a Democratic superlawyer with multimillion-dollar backing

See? Crooked Hillary is trying to undermine election laws.

 

You did not give ANY proof. What you gave was an opinion piece that did not comport to the facts. Wikipedia article that does not comport to the facts. A table of duplicate voter registrations that even the group that made the list even admits that there is no proof that these duplicate voter registrations have caused voter fraud just that it is possible because they exist.

Your "proof" is sorely in need of factual evidence.

 

Another opinion piece that is long on hot air and extremely short on facts.

So now are you saying that it should be illegal for people to seek redress in the court system? You do understand that this is a Constitutional right don't you? So now you prevent people from exercising their Constitutional rights?

Also what you fail to mention as that many of these voter restrictions have been PROVEN to be racist in effect and in the case of North Carolina to be racist in design and in effect. So why is it that you support racist voting restrictions?

 

I'll disagree. But if you did have any facts to back up your assertions or that dispute mine, I'm sure you'll provide them in your next post.

 

I understand that they are trying to undermine elections and election laws that by right are the responsibility of each of the 50 states to pass, which they did, in the legislatures, signed by the governors, which have already passed Constitutional muster in the United States Supreme Courts on several occasions.

I also understand that the only argument the far left wing liberal demagogues have left on most issues is to play the race card and usually it involves making racist stereotypes which betray their own racist beliefs and prejudices such as claiming that voter identification laws discriminate against black people because black people are too dumb to know how to obtain government photo ID's. As it is, registration has gone up for blacks after the laws have been passed proving that their arguments and objections are totally false. But you go ahead with that racist narrative that black people are too stupid to get an ID for the purposes of voting.

 

I am not making the assertions. You are.

- - - Updated - - -

So now conservative judges appointed by Reagan and GWB are far left liberal demagogues????? What a farce.

 

You made the assertion that my "proof is sorely in need of factual evidence" yet I'm the only one to provide factual evidence, you have neither presented any evidence nor refuted mine.

When did I say that? Strawman.

 

You said it when you said this;

Two of the three judges that ruled the NC law was specifically designed to be racist were a Reagan appointee and GWB appointee. So I guess they are just liberal demagogues right?

As to your "proof" again I explained why it is not proof. Opinion pieces are NOT proof. They are just regurgitated opinions. That is all you offered. Opinions on opinions no proof. You made the assertion. I found your proof wanting and stated exactly why now it is up to you to provide real proof. I know you cannot because NONE exists.

 

Once again it's a strawman argument, especially when I never said anything of the sort.

As if Reagan or Bush court appointees were all conservative judges, but that aside, I'm talking about the bastards that put these arguments forward. I'm talking about the Democratic Party and their cronies that think the argument "black people are too stupid to obtain voter ID's" is a great play against republicans. Go ahead and tell black people how dumb they are. Your treatment of blacks over the past 50 years is coming to light and you won't be able to keep them on the Democratic Party's slave plantation forever.

 

They made no such argument. That is just asinine.

Just to get this straight if I make an argument that a particular law is racist and judge reviews the law and finds that it is racist the judge gets a pass by you but I am considered a far-left racist demagogue? With logic like that it is no wonder you support Trump.

 

The basic premise for the theory that the laws are racist is the Democratic Party's own premise, that blacks will be discriminated against because they are too stupid to know how to get voter ID's or picture ID's. Okay, they don't actually say they are "too stupid", but it implied. So which party is the racist party, the Republicans, who want to give Civil Rights to blacks and not waste time and money that should be spent helping blacks; or the Democratic Party, who thinks that blacks are too dumb to obtain an ID, and then spend all their time, money and effort destroying the Civil Rights movement by pandering to illegal immigrants who the Civil Rights Era was not intended for, and pandering to gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgenders who don't know how to go to the bathroom, and pandering to the Teachers Unions instead of poor disadvantaged at risk inner city black children?

 

You call Trump's bogus self-serving policies...visions? That's generous.

 

I like his stated policies of renegotiating our trade deals and ceasing to engage in stupid wars that cost trillions and thousands of US lives.

 

That is fine and dandy in theory, but Trump speaks with a forked tongue and if he had any integrity he would have had his line of products manufactured here all along. I still believe that his candidacy was all about the free press and publicity anyway and that even he is shocked that he made it to the nomination.

 

I will certainly admit that Trump seems to be selling a bunch of hollow rhetoric out there. I think his statements against Mexicans were extremely vile. However he is right regarding the destructive nature of the trade deals that were hatched by GOP congressional members and signed by Bill Clinton. He is also the only one besides Bernie Sanders who called down the Cheney/Bush cabal for their idiotic foreign policy and the Iraq war, which has totally destabilized the Middle Eastern region and created an era of chaos and terrorism throughout the world. My point is that if he would stop all of the silly name calling and stick to the issues that resonate with people of all political stripes, he would probably be leading in this election.

 

He is unstable and self-absorbed and I totally believe what the ghostwriter of The Art of The Deal has to say about him. More and more people are turning their backs regardless of how well he panders or learns to read a teleprompter.

 

You will get no argument from me regarding what a pompous narcissistic jackass he is. Too bad the GOP couldn't come up with a guy who was against nation building and sell out trade deals that wasn't a lunitic. But it is also too bad the Democrats couldn't come up with a candidate who isn't a neoCON in disguise.

 

Okay so, I know there are plenty more videos and I hope I didn't already post this one, but I ran across it and knew it has to be a part of this thread. Hopefully I will later find time to document what a total disaster this fiasco was in spite of the media claims that it was a total success.

[video=youtube;_UiFYiX_umk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UiFYiX_umk[/video]​

 

Hey everyone, what happened to [MENTION=52959]dujac[/MENTION]? Not posted since August 7th. Anyone know?