Unarmed woman is shot by Police in Capitol. The People Who Scream ‘Police Brutality’ Don’t Care.

Bring Ashli's killer to justice.

 

Of course I read your posts. You should read mine.
They only hurt for a second or two.

'The DP political bosses have not systematically murdered millions of Americans yet.
The great progressive era monsters, like Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot, remain in a league of their own.

But any political faction that tilts toward the Big Government model is a dangerous enemy of humanity.' Ddy

 

Boy, you do have a problem with definitions. Seriously, have you ever consulted a dictionary before you just make up stuff. The right just seems to have their own language, like pig Latin.

 

LOL! I note that you are unable to cite a single example.

 

Hitler was a progressive ? How can you converse with anyone who Trolls.

 

LOL! Walter Lippmann, the "progressive" Democrat praised Hitler. A lot of "progressives" praised Hitler and Mussolini. Do you deny that fact? Or not?

OTOH, I think Hitler and Lippmann and those who praise him are pond scum.

The Nazi Party in Germany was aided by a radical youth movement in the colleges led by radical "progressive" professors like Martin Heidegger.

“As early as March 3 [1933] three hundred university professors of all political persuasions declared themselves for Hitler in an election appeal, while the mass of the students had gone over to the National Socialists considerably earlier. As early as 1931, the party with 50 or 60 percent of the votes, enjoyed almost twice as much support from the universities as in the country as a whole.” Joachim C. Fest, “The Face of the Third Reich,” “Portraits of the Nazi Leadership,” Pantheon Books NY 1970, P. 249. (Internal quote Karl Bracher taken by Fest from Bracher Sauer, and Schulz, “Die nationalsozilistische Machtergreifung”), P. 252.

So, was Heidegger a Nazi or a progressive, or both?

 

Wow. A writer praised Hitler back-in the 1930s....so that makes Hitler a progressive. Wow.....You’re really Full of strange ideas.

Trump kissed Putin and made luv to NK dictator. That makes Trump a democrat and Putin a progressive using your logic....strange dude.

 

Again you seem to have been disinformed.

LOL! Yes, "progressives" supported Hitler. They even voted for him. Why deny the obvious? Does that make Hitler a progressive? What is a progressive? Are you one?

Well, over 90% of the citizens of the Saar voted for annexation into Hitler's Nazi Germany so we actually know the kind of popular support that sustained Hitler's regime.

 

That’s all ridiculous. Hitler was a fascist whose soul politic was total devotion to the fuhrer by his followers. Fascism has a definition. Look it up.it has nothing to do with liberal progressives. Why don’t you look up the definition of progressive instead of pretending you know when you’re just making up s.h.I.t.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ty’-don’t-care.583573/page-59#post-1072634966

 

Don’t be ridiculous. Guess you’ve never been to the capital building. The chambers are very small and segregated. Each only allows a small number. The police blocked some of the entrances.

 

So your argument is that, if it was bigger, every single person would have rioted?

 

Yup. Only the the chickenshit Trump would have not gone in....he left the scene.

 

Interesting. The investigation has turned up a possible reason why the police were not defending themselves against rioters, even to the extent they were beaten. It seems Trump was willing to use the ARMY GUARD to defend the rioters who were beating cops and looking to Lynch Penske and go after Democrats like Pelosi et al. He didn’t want them to defend the Govt. and any congressmen., just the rioters.

There is no reason why the police were not in communication with Army Guard and why they were so late in responding. They were avoiding a conflict with the police when the Army May have been trying to protect traitors who were trying over-throw the Govt. This is your president trying to use the military to overthrown the election. It seems the military did what they could to be late to fight. TRUMP IS A FREEKING TRAITOR. This is straight from the mouth of Trump lackey acting pentagon chief.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/co...botched-capitol-riot-preparations-2021-05-12/

 

Why the military was late .......they were “trying”” to avoid being ordered to overthrow the Govt.

“Miller was Trumps acting sec of defense.

“Miller testified that the U.S. military was deliberately restrained that day when Trump's rally turned into an assault by hundreds of his followers that left five dead, including a Capitol Police officer.

“Miller testified that he was concerned in the days before Jan. 6 that sending National Guard troops to Washington would fan fears of a military coup or that Trump advisers were advocating martial law.”
Trump told Miller to "fill" the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: "Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights."

 

We also have Hitler sympathizers and a Nazi party lead by righties who supported fascism. In reality, the Nazis party in America were the precursors of the TRUMP SUPPORTERS. Is that conservative enough ?

book/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_American_Bund

 

You again failed to prove that Donald did not mean it.

Ah... whataboutism.

 

the free independent press who taped it all is no prove? You're being dishonest because we all know you're wrong.

Indeed. And with the images, they are disputing that lil opinion of that 1 person who took the stand.

It was your point is that there must have been a violent protester.
And you failed to prove it. And you're dishonest about it as well. Simple.

 

It does. You go argue how the connection to the riot while on capitol grounds could possible otherwise can be interpreted. While the black guy who got shot while fleeing did not have a gun at all or was reaching for one.


Point also still stands:
Cops do not shoot violent white fascist busy killing them,
while not having a problem shooting a black man fleeing.

 

The Military Times disagrees. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...d-didnt-respond-to-the-attack-on-the-capitol/

 

Well, let’s look at the testimony I referenced and quoted by the acting secretary of defense under oath.

 

He didn't SAY that "there was no reason why the police were not in communication with Army Guard and why they were so late in responding." That was YOUR claim.

 

According to your incorrect interpretation of Miller's testimony.

They weren't rioters at that point (obviously, given that it was BEFORE the riot), but yes, according to Miller,
Trump stupidly thought that the National Guard would be most appropriately used to protect protesters. Against what threat? Only Trump knows.

 

Your source doesn't say that the ones with guns were part of the riot. Simple!

 

EVERYTHING was taped?

You have no proof that he is an unreliabe witness. Meanwhile, you say that your source from the same hearing is totally reliable when you know NOTHING about him! Double standard!

I'm saying that we don't know for sure. It's POSSIBLE that the cops are part of a huge conspiracy to cover everything up by lying about violent protesters.