Notice that not one of the Liberals here will deal with the actual content and event? They call it "lies" with blanket statements, but have to the Liberal refused to refute any of the below facts. Undisputed FACTS about Libya: We had our consulate attacked on 9/11 and were warned prior. Britain pulled their ambassador out from the warnings and perceived danger. We had our ambassador begging for security prior. We had U.S. Navy SEALS who were nearby get radio transmission of the terrorist attack and ask for permission to go help. They were denied (3) Times. The disobeyed the order after the 3rd denial. The U.S. Navy Seals took U.S. rooftop positions and battled off the terrorists for over 7 hours before dying. The constantly throughout that time radio transmitted for help. It never came and they were left to die with the ambassador. The U.S. Navy Seals had lasers which "paint" a target so smart bombs are hit within 1 foot. They confirmed that they had the targets "painted". Had the U.S. Navy Seals that disobeyed orders not showed up, it is estimated that another 30 U.S. staff would have been murdered. Barack Obama was informed within 1 hour of the 7 hour attack. Barack Obama never convened the situation room with his top military minds for solutions. Barack Obama, Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, and Jay Carney all went out publicly and told the U.S. people that this was a protest over a Youtube video trailer of a movie that no one watched. (That is a lie.) Barack Obama flew the next day to Las Vegas to raise money and party. The #1 rule for American military is that we don't leave our guys behind. You do not do it. It breaks my heart to think of the betrayal that had to be going through the U.S. Navy SEALS minds as they heroically fought for over 7 hours against a greater force, with better weapons, in the dark after saving over 30 U.S. Staff. They were left behind to die. They knew how to win the battle and were denied support to do so. Doherty and Woods are heroes. They and their family deserved so much more and they are due the truth.
I linked a page from BBC with the attacks "as they happened". Reference whichever "facts" you can, from your post, and we'll discuss the info from your links. It's a fair request.
You're a troll because you are more interested in pushing buttons that addressing a subject. Now... you tell me which facts you dispute specifically and if I link you proof, then you admit you either didn't know or were wrong. Does that sound fair?
In my honest opinion, this is why the GOP failed to win the White House. There is no cover up. Not a single person can explain what it is that the right wing pundits are prattling on about. Whilst the country burned the GOP fiddled. The (*)(*)(*)(*)ed around, lobbing (*)(*)(*)(*) pile after (*)(*)(*)(*) pile, praying to their gods that some of the (*)(*)(*)(*) would stick. Fast and Furious, this Benghazi (*)(*)(*)(*), the constant accusations of Muslims taking over the government, all just made up (*)(*)(*)(*) spewed from the minds of folks hypnotizing the weak minded on AM radio. They had a chance to unseat an ineffective and unpopular president by putting forth an actual platform. Instead what they did was come up with stupid soundbites for the drooling and moronic masses. No plan. No killer app. No ideas. Just flinging (*)(*)(*)(*). Congrats GOPers. This is what you elected representatives are doing. (*)(*)(*)(*)ing around signing meaningless (*)(*)(*)(*) letters. You folks deserved to lose.
I suppose you might think that someone asking you back up your repeatedly claimed "unidsputed facts" would be "pushing buttons". So let's start with your very first "fact" and then move on. "We had our consulate attacked on 9/11 and were warned prior." I dispute there the US had warnings that the Bengazi consulate was going to be attacked on 9/11 prior to the attack. Please provide your evidence and source that that the US was warned of the attack prior to the attack.
Really, you guys need to give up this little charade as if you care so much about the four Americans that died. I could guarantee if this was Romney most of you would have been silent. This is simply something being maliciously used for political reasons and you KNOW it. So cut your holier-than-though, so concerned for American's dead crying routine. The fact that these scavengers are waltzing around shouting about Benghazi soley for some sort of desperate Obama overthrow is disgusting. You're not even American's at this point. More like animals.
You will never get anywhere with these tiny limp dicked little pukes...They have no decency or class, only hatred...They got their asses kicked, now they are going to hold their breath till they turn blue...You have to remember that these guys have been trained like monkees by the think tank supported AM radio morons who drone in their ears 24-7-365....It is hilarious to watch them circle jerking themselves into a wild frenzy after they have been exposed as a bunch of hapless blowhard buffoons...Cheers
Source CBS NEWS - I made sure not to use the Fox Source as it would upset you greatly. Also, CBS refused to do a nightly news story on this, so it is only in internet print. There are far better and more detailed sources out there, but I chose a lockstep liberal one so you could wrap your mind around it. /Thread Win
Most of these imbeciles defended Bush after he and his team sat on their asses while 3000 Americans were murdered in 2001, then cheered wildly as he and his war profiteering cronies lied us into a war in which hundreds of thousands of US soldiers were maimed and killed to the tune of trillions in taxpayer money...Now all of a sudden they have their little panties in a twisted wad regarding an unfortunate tragedy at our counsulate in Benghazi...These are the lowest form of political scum molded by the likes of Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh and the like...Cheers
That is the proof of your "undisputed fact"? Are you kidding me? That is a general travellers warning to Lybia. It has nothing to do with an attack on the embassy. So where is the warning that the embassy would be attacked that you claimed was an undisputed fact? "We had our consulate attacked on 9/11 and were warned prior." I'm starting to smell the bull(*)(*)(*)(*) already, and we are only on the very first so-called "undisputed fact" /thread fail
The Benghazi consulate was attacked last June. It was a bomb attack. Do you acknowledge that this event happened? If so, there's all the warning that one needs on the necessity to be alert and maintain a high level of security.
How cute... another little liberal semantic warrior! Let's try again.... in bigger print... "Aug. 27, 2012 .... the threat of assassination and car bombings in Benghazi" - CBS NEWS How about another source? [video=youtube_share;7iC7ezp53EY]http://youtu.be/7iC7ezp53EY[/video] I know... it hurts your soul. But this reporter from the Pentagon cites real senior sources and at the end will tell of the another warning 3 hours prior. This is a complete meltdown of security by Barack Obama's Administration. This reporter deserves a Pulitzer for this work. She has rock solid sources and quotes.
How does a bomb set off, not exactly a rare ocurrence in the ME, constitute prior warning of the attack on 9/11?
Margot, as usual you've no clue what's the subject of discussion is... I is not about Congres... Is about the shyster lying. Simple as that.
So, rightwingfoamers, when do you officially launch the next multi-billion $ (adjusted for inflation) impeachment witch-hunt? seeing how well it worked-out for gingrich and assorted crotch-sniffers, I encourage you to waste the next four years trying to impeach a democratically elected president. Do it! Do it!
Let's try again, with a bigger font, since that seems impressive to you: That is the proof of your "undisputed fact"? Are you kidding me? That is a general travellers warning to Lybia. It has nothing to do with an attack on the embassy. So where is the warning that the embassy would be attacked that you claimed was an undisputed fact? "We had our consulate attacked on 9/11 and were warned prior." I'm starting to smell the bull(*)(*)(*)(*) already, and we are only on the very first so-called "undisputed fact" /thread fail
