How much of Palestine should the Arabs get back? - <MOD WARNING>

MOD WARNING - This thread has been issued a mod warning at post No. 483. Any further flamebait, taunting or insults will be treated as if the poster has already been given a moderator's official warning and the poster may be subject to an infraction as if they have already been warned. Please tone it down.


Palestine used to belong to the Arabs.

Then The West conquered it with help from the Arabs, but betrayed the Arabs and let the land be used as a Jewish nation rather than let the people decide for themselves who should rule it.

So how much of the land should go back to the Arabs?

- - - Updated - - -

I voted back to the 1967 borders, but if Israel and Palestine want 1 for 1 landswaps to account for a few settlements close to West Jerusalem, I got no problem with that.

 

Back to the 1967 borders.

 

I'd say 1967 but that ain't gonna happen, not with Israel's high birthrate and fast growing population

 

All of it in one single democratic state with a Jewish Homeland within it, as originally envisaged.

The two state solution is over it will never happen, the Jews will have to learn to live in peace or die, that is the terrible stark truth.

 

None of it.

 

Excellent post. A really stupid poll, if you ask me. All they will get is the Gaza Strip and it will be demilitarized. If they misbehave with IslamoTerror, we can easily send the IDF in on bombing missions.

- - - Updated - - -

Another good reply. I would give em the Gaza Strip (the good ones, such as kids and young women). I would deport terrorist-age men back to Jordan.

 

Excellent votes, so far the majority say go back to the 1967 borders, which is of course a fair outcome.

 

Read your Bible.. Sargon 2 settled 4 Arab tribes in Samaria in 700 BC.... and there were Arabs in Jerusalem after the Babylonian exile.

- - - Updated - - -

Do Jewish people have a high birthrate?

 

"Go back to 1967 borders" is up to 60%

excellent decision my friends.

the 1967 borders is the just and fair option.

 

Not only do we have a great birth rate, but we will continue to welcome in the Jewish diaspora.

Palestinian occupiers and terrorists will be forced to make way and will be sent to the Gaza Strip and back home to Jordan.

 

Israel will likely return to very close to the 1967 borders, by choice or by force.

the tide is turning for justice and fairness

 

How much of Palestine should the Arabs get back?........>>

Not a steekin inch......!

 

I don't believe it's about being Jewish, more so about survival.

Israel has the highest birth rate in the developed world, and that's becoming a problem

 

Arabs have a much higher birthrate than Jews in Israel.

that's how their numbers grew from 200,000 to 1.3 million in less than 70 years.

 

No, its not fair. The Arabs wanted war in 1967, the Israeli's didn't wait for their enemies to be fully prepared and beat the Arabs to the punch. The Arabs lost and paid the price. Israel should keep all the land. In fact, Israel should quit playing stupid games of "peace" with people that don't want peace, Israel should clean out the local area, remove the terrorists, make it all under Israeli rule, and be done with it.

 

Well, the more they terrorize us, the more likely they will get nothing!

- - - Updated - - -

I agree. An excellent post. We should give them the Gaza Strip, but demilitarize it so that the IDF can bomb it if they terrorize us using Gaza as a base. Better though they all go back to Jordan.

 

Israel is not a peaceful creation though, in fact it's one of the main colonialism like events of more recent times.

Israel terrorized Palestinians to flee, and even expelled them in the Nakba.

It's no wonder why Palestinians aren't too keen on Israel, who bulldozes their houses, and walls them off.

 

The 1967 borders.

More realistic than my plan, which would have been a semitic confederation of both Arabs and Jews, with maybe a Jewish-city state in Jerusalem, much like the Vatican. Stupid, childish vision of utopia by now.

 

blame God for the terror. its says so in the Bible.

 

Israel will remove the Palestinian Occupiers, by sending them to some combination of the Gaza Strip and back home to Jordan. There are now many Jewish immigrants coming to the Jewish State of Israel, so the more properties we can find for them, by removing the illegal Palestinian occupiers, the better.

Palestinians who refuse to comply with our policies will be regarded as enemies of the state. We will allow some Palestinians to stay on Israeli land, since we have a shortage of workers in the menial sectors (e.g. sewage disposal).

 

What are you going to do with all the Israeli fifth columnists who people will rise up against in the western world because of Israel's policies?

 

Why are you being such a silly person all the time?

Are you yourself going to kick out families from their homes or would you rather someone else do it for you?

You dont mean any of that and dont even argue for why it should be so. All you do is make statements that we can easily counter.

None of the things you say will happen are actually going to happen. None.

And what do you mean by illegal occupiers? By what law?

Lemme guess, you dont want to answer as usual.

- - - Updated - - -

Hell now tell you these people will be killed/ deported etc etc.

Doesnt mention how this will happen or whether he himself plans to take part in the violence and ethnic cleansing.

 

Oh I truly believe there will be a reckoning, a bloodbath in the middle east and people who have dual nationality will be driven out in western countries. The real "fifth columnist will be safe, it will be people like my boys, completely innocent who will suffer. And I will defend them no matter what.

 

I don't think they should get any land back. In fact, I think Israel should annex gaza, the west bank, and the golan hieghts, but there can still be arab autonomy under Israeli sovereignty. I do not believe in a two-state solution. Why? For practical reasons. here's my reasoning. Firstly, Israel already exist. Regardless of wheter that was right or wrong historically, it now exists. removing Israel isn't an option. Secondly, if we think that Israel should exist it also follows that they should have defensible borders (that means gaza, west bank, golan). In my view, saying that Israel can exist, but not have defensible borders, isn't an option. A two-state solution is not an option because it would leave Israel vulnerable. The area is simply not big enough for two separate countries.

Let me emphasise, this is not a moral argument. wheter the arabs or jews have the right to the land doesn't matter to me. You can't get rid of the arabs or the jews, but there can only be one state. I think it should be an Israeli state, with autonomous arab regions. That is, in my view, the only workable solution.

 

Nothing. Palestine is a fiction.