Islam has replaced communism.

shhhh, can you hear banjo music?
[video=youtube;Uzae_SqbmDE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uzae_SqbmDE[/video]

 

Lovely music....my four wives and I will dance to it merrily....sorry.. music is not permitted
by Allah The Moon God..

https://www.facebook.com/notes/fans...-what-islam-says-about-music/243197469166453/

Just for the linkaholics....see above...another delightful arm of Islam...

 

If the conversation or topic doesn't get twisted and distorted to make Aborigines look like the victims, or that gold doesn't flow from their rectum. then LeftRightLeft will never be satisfied.

He now denigrates, and makes fun of intellectually challenged people who play a bango - very sad. Then he accuses others of denigrating him and his partner, but NO ONE has ever mentioned his partner.

I think he is mentally disturbed, and so full of hatred and anger that no amount of reason would prevail.

I feel sorry for him now. He obviously has some severe mental issues that have never been resolved.

I think he is quite a bad actually considering his comments, so I am not continuing this anymore.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nority-officers-boost-diversity.html#comments

The slaughter of British culture...
British female police may be allowed to wear burkas...
3400 comments but I didnt read them all...
With the political correctness and the sucking up to muslims by the Australian Government, I wouldnt
be surprised if we are next....after all...we are part of the British Monarchy....
I dont believe in political correctness...but I guess I am an infidel....

 

Let go of the hate, you'll feel much better. Rather than rely on exaggeration and outright lies that you may hear or read about anyone, find the truth about them for yourself. Yes it's hard work but it can help purge the hate from you and that's a good thing. Rather than simply contradict, argue with evidence, it's more fun too.

 

There would be no forum under Sharia law.

 

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/quran-hate.aspx

Well, yes, I guess I should love them...after all, I am lower than a dog in their eyes..
(quote from the Koran...)
If 61% of the Koran talks about non-believers, and how they should be despised and
hated, i suppose I should just turn the other cheek...naively...definitely....
As an infidel, I better not walk my dog by myself.....

 

Who introduced the phrase "political correctness"? Politicians. A bunch of liars, too scared to speak the truth.

Who with an ounce of moral and ethical fiber in their soul would want to emulate these cretins?

 

Go to your nearest Mosque and preach that, and see if you return without an ambulance being involved

 

Speaking of mosques...2000 in France and 1700 in Britain..and the link is 4 years old...

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2761/converting-churches-into-mosques

 

They have to build their training and terrorist camps somewhere to specially educate their children to hate the infidels without the infidels knowing.

But hey! They are all moderate Muslims - right?

 

Why not post some links to prove your point, fabricating evidence is what you do best. Oh that's right, I keep pointing out your lies.

So it's just your opinion?

 

https://www.rt.com/uk/356367-ban-hate-preachers-mosques/

This good enough for you bro...!!

 

Good enough for what? Yes it is very good. Our government needs to pick up its act, we need to do more and be harder on the radicals

 

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/man-in-go...ist-act-from-behind-bars-20160914-grgbmw.html

Todays update...

 

On this issue those against Muslims are simply targeting the wrong group. Since people are dying and heads in the public are exploding calling for any solution no matter how detestable, we've stopped targeting those who are actually guilty, and broadened the search to include 1 in 5 of people on the planet.

It's a common public reaction to things which make their heads explode, shouting "won't somebody please think of the children?!?!". Dealing with gun crime by targeting peaceful gun owners is another instance.

 

I assume from your post that you totally reject the stats contained in the link for population size in each country...
and the comments attached...

 

In fact I did read their assessment and find it entirely beside the point. Consider, you could narrow that 1 in 5 humans on the planet figure quite considerably by going from Muslims to Sunni Muslims, or better yet: any individual who has been shown in a court of law to have committed a terrorist act.

By making the targeted group excessively large you do net more of the guilty. All I'm asking is that you recognize that this also skyrockets the number of innocents included, to the point where your targeted group includes 20% of all humans: almost entirely innocents.

Hence my disagreement with the link.

 

So you dont think that the Islamic goal is to spread Sharia law worldwide...

 

If it was, why wouldn't more countries that already are predominately Muslim be using Sharia law? I posted a link showing the statistics, most Muslim countries if they do incorporate Sharia Law only incorporate the divorce and inheritance parts. These parts are more custom anyway.

I agree with SP, this is being blown into ridiculous proportions, I have shown over and over again where what the alarmists say is fabricated.

 

You have shown over and over again....just who the hell do you think you are....

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/uk-sharia-law.html

I dont just make this up...

 

The goal of some Muslims is to spread Sharia law by force. I have no issue with the harshest of measures against these people, either with a bullet to the brain by a nearby citizen, or through due process of law once in custody. But that is not at all what this thread advocates - instead proposing that we attack a group comprised mostly of innocents, purely due to guilt by association arguments. I didn't support it with the bikies, I'm not going to support that principle here.

Incidentally, I take no issue whatsoever with voluntary arbitration under Sharia law or any other legal code - keyword voluntary.

My main point is that there is no homogenous glob of people called Islam, with all the same beliefs and ambitions. We should permit all citizens the basic decency of being evaluated in the eyes of the law as an individual.

I am not too hot on immigration from poor countries irrespective of their faith. Ideally I would permit it, but we've created a moral hazard by offering eventual citizens hundreds of thousands of dollars of free money over their lifetimes. Until we fix that situation by substantially amending or repealing our social safety net, the problems created by immigration will continue. You tend not to be too into a culture when you're only moving there for free $$$.

 

Your right we shouldn't have been scared of an ideology that mass murdered over 80 million people last century
but the ideology that massed less then half of that we need to be deathly scared of

 

Voluntary arbitration under Sharia law does not exist.
Women are disadvantaged under divorce settlements and all Sharia
Tribunals are conducted by male muslims. The entire system under Sharia
law totally favours male muslims as female muslims are only regarded as
half the worth of a man. Tell me the next time you hear of a female running
a Sharia Tribunal...it wont happen.
If you do some research, you will find Sharia Law does not end in divorce settlements.
And if you do some more research and open your eyes you may start to see where
Im coming from...

 

Again, it doesn't matter who they mutually agree to pick as their arbitrator, so long as they mutually agree. That is the nature of arbitration. By depriving women of the right to settle disputes voluntarily, you adopt a measure of the repression which exists in Muslim society.

It's a very similar issue to Halal. So long as the Halal certification body isn't forcing any businesses to adopt is certification, I have no issue with it. Neither with kosher standards.

What does everything I'm advocating here have in common? It's voluntary. Nobody is forcing anyone to accept arbitration they disagree with, nobody is forcing businesses to adopt Halal certification. If they were I'd be the first to jump on it and purpose its abolition.

Thanks for the speedy response.