Senate Intel Dems Admit There May Be ZERO Evidence Of Collusion Between Russians And Trump Campaign

You appear not to know who James Clapper is, so my first tutoring lesson will be free.

Obama's nominee and Director of National Intelligence said specifically to Lib media Chuck Todd, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump Campaign and the Russians. You fell for the left's fake news hook, line and sinker.

 

So which do you believe? The one politicians put together or testimony from the men themselves? Don't beat around the bush answer the question.

13 minutes in they discuss it if you are brave enough to watch.

Here is a list of all the false statements in the establishment findings.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-s...acies-with-firsthand-account-from-the-ground/

 

[media]

Remember this exchange in the 2012 debate. Obama really looks like the tool that he is now doesn't he. The left just needed to have somebody to blame for their astonishing loss in 2016.

 

Baseless suppositions are not a substitute for facts.

 

Yes. Romney didn't confront it as effectively as Trump. The progressives and their allies in the media determined to end the Trump administration by any means possible.

Trump is the antithesis of everything his opponents believe in their heart of hearts to be sacrosanct in the Brave New World they have worked so long to create.

History, science, and culture are replete with lessons proving that the socialist agenda leads to ruin—a ruin that is being hurried along today by sticky globs of political correctness and multiculturalism that supersede the rights of individual expression.

At stake is our liberal constitution democracy formed as a representative Republic dedicated to securing our rights.

 

No matter the smug attitude that Hillary winning was a foregone conclusion, I think the internal polling showed Hillary was losing. So the Obama administration ginned up this Russian connection as a "legitimate" cover so they could get a FISA warrant for Trump Towers servers. While they ruled out any Russia connection, who know what other information was gleaned and passed on at the same time. It's time for a special prosecutor. I also believe that's why they went after Sessions so hard, just to make him think twice about doing so. I say Damn the torpedoes....full speed ahead.

 

For the first time in my life, I'm proud being a deplorable.

 

Geographically, not culturally. In geopolitics Vladimir Putin currently tries to pursue the strategy of eurasian union, economic and defence, but it does not works well. Rather it just help to retain some economic connections that post-soviet states inherited from USSR.

Culturally, and as society, citizens of RF are not significantly different from any other european country, even the ones living in far East. There is more soviet culture in country, than straight asian.

 

Or, when they realized they lost and that Trump would find out everything they had done when he took over, they started flogging this narrative to justify their actions.

 

Interesting. I have no direct knowledge, so thank you for sharing yours. I hope we can get along, but I bet we end up at loggerheads.

 

Surely you can quote these damning tweets

 

*shrugs* If you wish to talk to me personally - I can always give my Skype adress. As for talks there - there is not that many things that I'd have fierce debates about.

 

That's a fair question. I guess it's because, given the choice between having the country run based on information provided by the CIA or alternative facts provided by Breitbart... the ol' boys at the company suddenly start becoming more appealing.

Now given, as the statistics you provide show, that republicans w were such fans, why are they now OK with a president who bases his positions on radical right extremists, over the intelligence services?

 

Excellent point!

 

NO. There has never been any evidence of that. No money ever donated to the Clinton Foundation EVER found its way into the pocket of anyone named Clinton.

Incidentally. If someone send you a pornographic image that is sent to your spam folder which you never review or delete are you then a pornographer?

 

Every single thing claimed about Clinton and Benghazi was proven though, that's the difference.

Leftists, despite being the self proclaimed "most informed", aren't even aware of what actually happened in those hearings.

 

From Obama's hand picked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper......

To quote Jethro Tull from his album "Thick as a Brick"....I may make you feel but I can't make you think.

Who paid for those jet airplane rides? It IRS considers that income.

 

Not sure what you were responding to in the Clapper thing but...


Travel on behalf of the Foundation is not considered personal and is not income. Again, not a shred of evidence, in Foundation audited records, in tax returns, that anyone named Clinton received any benefit from the Foundation.

This is RW mythology.

 

Ha! You lefties love your conspiracy theories don't you?

 

Yes you have to dig a bit to find out this "conversation with Guccifer 2.0" was over twitter.

 

Yep, this thing has just begun. The latest connection between a Russian bank computer and the Trump organization computer is especially strange.

 

Get a grip.

Where was Obama born? Who attacked us on 911?

 

Riding around in their jet is.

 

Obama attacked us on 9/11?

 

After the CIA swore that Iraqi WMD were a "slam dunk", I'm not sure why you consider them incapable of providing alternative facts. They also failed to see the rise of ISIS. They didn't see the Arab Spring coming and totally missed Kim Jong Il’s death.

They missed the Pearl Harbor Attack
They blew the Bay of Pigs.
They missed the Tet Offensive
They missed the Yom Kippur War
They missed the Iranian Revolution
They missed the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan
They missed the Collapse of the Soviet Union
They missed the Indian Nuclear Test
They missed the 9/11 Attacks

They have blown a lot of big calls.

From net +5 to net +4 for Republicans is fairly neutral and flat

Democrats, on the other hand have gone from - 20 to + 32. That's a 52 point swing. And I'll repeat my question: Why have Democrats had a such a net swing toward the CIA?