I don't have names. One of them was the CEO of Burisma. You can probably look up his name on the internet if you are interested. But obviously you aren't interested. The current estimate is that the family has taken in around $50 million. He gave political influence in exchange.
CEO of Burisma paid Joe how much? When? What did Joe give in exchange? And do you have any evidence for ANYTHING?
There is just no legal basis at all to ignore a subpoena, or conspire to not comply with it. He should’ve tried to sue
There is a mountain of evidence. You should have asked if there is proof and the answer to that is no. Lots of smoke, no fire.
Contact the FBI.... it is their job to investigate... They would have all the receipts you need.. here is their searchable web site... their investigation should be in there... vault.fbi.gov Please share with us when you find it...
He has the goods on the corrupt Biden family... The FD-1023 form revealed an obvious problem no one seems to realize.... It is not a Burisma paying the Biden family thang.... The Biden family did a "shakedown" on Burisma/Zlochevsky and was "forced" to pay for protection from the Biden family...... https://www.scribd.com/document/660206008/FD-1023-Senator-Grassley-FINAL#
That is the left wing way to look at it. I understand that. Bank records, emails, public whistlebower testimony must all be rumors. I get it.
Hmm... So, while he publicly says he won't pardon his child, Biden is actively using his DOJ to keep him out of jail... I know, the obvious never seems to matter to you folks... But, should he actually be convicted, I'd expect that Joe would in fact pardon his child. Jean Pierre isn't the first press secretary that lies on the podium.
Why not? Possession of government records, pictures of those records being stored in a bathroom, the fact that Trump hid those records and recordings of Trump saying that this paper I'm holding is classified and I could have declassified when I was President but I didn't must all be rumors, right?
There is a need to "repeat yourself" Although it really isn't "repeating" if you never answered the question in the first place.
You didn't want to be swayed by it the first time and you won't be swayed by a repeat. Waste of time continuing this.
In all this highlighting and marking up of this document why do the RW posters here skip over this part?